MetLife Pays Peanuts
Are you a fan of Peanuts and Snoopy? MetLife paid over 12 million dollars per year to license the use of the character until October 2016. Why? According to Chief marketing officer Esther Lee, MetLife wanted to make the company “more friendly and approachable during a time when insurance companies were seen as cold and distant.”
But, as an attorney who regularly files appeals of MetLife denials and sues MetLife for wrongful denials or termination, I think MetLife is like Lucy van Pelt. You remember Lucy, who pulled the football away just as Charlie Brown got ready to kick it, humiliating Charlie Brown.
Instead of pulling the football away, MetLife pulls the financial rug and safety net from under its disability insurance policyholders. Don’t let MetLife act like Lucy Van Pelt.
MetLife will:
- Use in-house nurses to review medical records and reach medical conclusions about the policy-holders restrictions and limitations even though those nurses may have no training in or qualifications to render any opinions about the policyholder’s medical conditions,
- Use biased medical peer review providers to create medical justifications for a claim’s denial,
- Use surveillance to discredit the policyholder’s complaints,
- Use in-house vocational evaluators to misclassify the policy holder’s occupation, perform questionable transferrable skills analysis and misinterpret the wages of and availability of other occupations it will claim the policyholder can do to justify the denial or termination of benefits.
MetLife plays games with initial applications and makes endless and multiple requests for medical, financial, and vocational information before it figures out a way to deny benefits. This delay and denial strategy drains the policy holder’s bank accounts as they try to stay financially afloat. It is their business model.
MetLife uses “liar for hire” doctors who give them the ammunition it needs to justify a claim’s denial or termination. MetLife rarely tells a denied policyholder the real reasons the claim was denied. Worse yet, MetLife claims by an experienced lawyer, like myself, who battles MetLife daily.
Don’t think that MetLife doesn’t play the claims delay, denial, or termination game with individual disability policies. They are and the policy benefits at stake are often much high so there is much more to lose if you aren’t represented by a MetLife individual disability attorney.
A MetLife Disability Attorney Will Help You with Your MetLife Claim By:
- Reviewing your policy,
- Reviewing your medical records,
- Create a pre-claim strategy to get your benefits on the initial application,
- Appeal a wrongful denial or termination by writing an appeal letter 25 to 60 pages long that is the trial of your case and goes to MetLife inbox,
- Protect you from aggressive claims handling by MetLife, including the delay game, the-we need more information-game, we want to take your statement game or we want to have you under an independent medical examination or FCE,
- Aggressively litigating your case, if need be.
Make no mistake about it, MetLife plays games with initial applications and makes endless and multiple requests for medical, financial, and vocational information before it figures out a way to deny benefits. This delay and denial strategy drains your bank accounts as you try to stay financially afloat.
MetLife uses “liar for hire” doctors who give MetLife the ammunition it needs to justify a claim’s denial or termination. MetLife rarely tells a denied policyholder, like you, the real reasons the claim was denied. Worse yet, MetLife fails to fully explain what you need to submit to successfully win an appeal.
That’s why it is crucial that you be represented at both the initial application and appeal stages of a MetLife claim by an experienced lawyer, like me, who battles MetLife daily.
Don’t Face MetLife On Your Own
Some MetLife policyholders make the mistake of going it alone and they pay dearly for “doing it yourself.” Once the appeals process is exhausted (and that really means you are exhausted by the endless requests for information and battling with MetLife), the only recourse is to file a lawsuit. If you purchased your insurance through your employer, the policy is most likely governed by the Employee Retirement Security Act or ERISA.
Despite its name, the ERISA statute and regulations are NOT policyholder friendly. You CANNOT add anything to the claims file after the last denial so all the Federal judge gets to see is what is in MetLife’s file which is stuffed with medical and vocational opinions that are favorable to MetLife. You didn’t know enough to get the claims file when you appealed, didn’t know enough to add medical, vocational or lay evidence to the file, or didn’t make the right arguments, you have all but destroyed your case.
An appeal of a denied MetLife claim is the trial of your case. Taking on a tough insurance company like MetLife is an endeavor for a specialist. A federal judge will give MetLife the benefit of the doubt because your MetLife policy requires you to prove they are wrong and not the other way around. You owe it to yourself and your family to have an experienced disability attorney, like me, take on MetLife. After all, this is about getting the disability benefits you deserve and you paid for.
Some policyholders have bought their own disability policy through an agent and that is known as an individual disability insurance policy. The game is the same but the playing field is more level because any claims denial can be challenged in state court which is a friendlier place to be if you have to sue MetLife.
Don’t think that MetLife isn’t playing the claims delay, denial, or termination game with individual disability policies. They are, and the policy benefits at stake are high. There is much more to lose if you aren’t represented by a MetLife individual disability lawyer.